A Company Filed a Claim Years Ago But Never Served It — Can They Revive It Now?
Based on: Free Leisure Ltd v Peidl and Company Ltd [2023] EWHC 792 (Comm) · View judgment
The Scenario
A creditor issued a minimal "bare claim form" just before the 6-year limitation period expired, then never served or progressed it for years.
The Conversation
This is how Case Buddy would handle this scenario — the same experience you get on the platform.
You
Case Buddy
You
Case Buddy
The Correct Legal Position
- •Under s.5 Limitation Act 1980, actions on simple contract (including most debts) must be brought within six years.
- •Issuing a claim form stops the limitation clock, but only if the claim is progressed in good faith.
- •Issuing a bare claim form solely to defeat limitation can constitute abuse of process under CPR 3.4(2).
- •The debtor must specifically plead the limitation defence — the court will not apply it automatically.
What the Court Decided
The court held that bare claim forms issued purely to stop limitation running amounted to abuse of process and should be struck out.
Important: This case study is for educational purposes only. Case Buddy provides legal information, not legal advice. Every situation is different — for advice specific to your circumstances, consult a qualified solicitor. Free advice is available from Shelter (housing), ACAS (employment), and StepChange (debt).
Facing a similar situation?
Describe your situation to Case Buddy and get free legal information tailored to your facts.
Start a Free CaseStay informed
Get legal tips and Case Buddy updates delivered to your inbox.